The end of blogging? Are
Facebook and Twitter making the blog obsolete? I suppose I can speak
to that since I haven't blogged at all since April 19, however I have
been twittering away. When your computer starts crashing every 15
minutes or so, twittering at 140 words or less is much easier - and
much less frustrating - than attempting a coherent blog post. I had
decided to get a new computer rather than trying to figure out the
problem but for some very strange unknowable reason my computer stopped
crashing a few days ago.
What prompted me to get back in the blogging game today was this column by Andrew Malcolm. What's coming up for future "tea party" protests. Malcolm concludes the tea party movement needs a leader, or as he calls it a "decider":
It will be interesting to see if someone emerges as organizers roll
out plans for the next round of protests. If it is to be effective in
the long term, it seems the movement will need a decider: not just a
public figurehead, but someone who can focus and modulate the
multifarious blob of themes and emotions that seem to drive this
fascinating middle-class revolt.
Someone, in short, who can tap
both the thoughtfulness and anger behind the movement, the patriotism
and Americans’ natural skepticism of government power … plus the
anti-Obamaism, the call for a fair tax, the fear of new controls on
carbon emissions. All that and more.
We managed to get the movement off the ground without a "decider" so I don't believe we necessarily need one now. We organized via the new media, Facebook, Twitter, and the not yet obsolete blogs. Along the way we attracted the attention of politicians, pundits, and Fox News. The above article by Andrew Malcolm was posted at Lucianne.com. Many commenters are arguing against the involvement of politicians and to a point I agree. The Tea Parties were conceived, promoted, and successfully carried out by We the People. Critics, most notably the Speaker of the House, tried to downplay the success of the Tea Parties by claiming they were organized and subsidized by the wealthiest people in America. Nancy Pelosi's blatant, intentional mischaracterization of the Tea Parties proves the power of a true grassroots movement:
Pelosi said the movement
"is funded by the high end - we call call it astroturf, it's not
really a grassroots movement. It's astroturf by some of the
wealthiest people in America to keep the focus on tax cuts for
the rich instead of for the great middle class."
Pelosi, of course, provided no names, no evidence of such involvement by the wealthiest people in America, she was flat-out lying. Now there's a shocker.
In order to build on the success of April 15th we need to remain a true grassroots movement but I don't think that necessarily means we should shun the involvement of like-minded politicians and pundits. We have many true conservatives serving in government at all levels and we need them as much as they need us. Why shut out those who agree and are willing to fight with and for us? No, we don't need them to lead but we need their voices. They are already in the arena, our movement can help them by discovering new talent to join them in Washington and in state and local governments. We are in perilous times right now and need all hands on deck.
Next up for the Tea Party Movement is Independence Day. Let's celebrate our Independence by reclaiming it. Loud and clear. Twitter it, Facebook it, and Blog it.