Hugh Hewitt makes the case for a sooner rather than later pick by McCain:
Yesterday Jennifer Rubin --don't miss her analysis of Obama's appeal to Jewish voters yesterday--
made an argument on my show that Senator McCain should wait until after
Senator Obama had selected his running mate in order to match the GOP
ticket well against the Dems.
I see the logic, but think the
time is now to throw the veep nominee fully into the fray and begin
working these crucial states, town-by-town and precinct-by-precinct.
Voters have to be engaged and persuaded about the very
different paths being put before them. McCain is doing this
effectively, but having two voices that command instant attention doing
so is a great advantage. The veep nominee will effectively double
the fund-raising efforts for House and Senate GOP candidates and the
national party as well, while also giving the media, old and new, a
second source of news every day. The Republicans need all the help
they can marshall and they need it now, not two or three months from
now.
Hugh makes a good point here. The long, drawn-out Democratic nomination process has benefited McCain but that could come to an abrupt end soon and at any rate it does not help him get his own message out.
Referring to Election Projection's latest electoral map Hugh states the need for McCain to pick someone who can "move the needle in PA, OH, MI, MN, WI, IA, CO, and NM". Is there any one candidate who could move the needle in all those states? (Hugh did say and). If I were going to pick one from McCain's weekend guest list, I'd say Mitt Romney. That's just a guess but judging from the states he needs help in, a Florida or Louisiana governor might not fill the bill. There is another question mark, however. Besides moving the needle in some of those moderate/weak states, McCain must make sure he hangs on to traditional conservative Republican voters. Some have already abandoned his campaign. This is a troubling sign and McCain must recognize it and factor it into his VP selection. Whether or not a strong conservative VP will change any minds is unknown, but a lukewarm conservative will likely send more Republicans to the mall on election day. Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal could possibly satisfy conservative fence sitters.
James P. Lucier made the case for Jindal in March. Lucier stresses Jindal's experience, he has at least as much as Barack Obama:
...Jindal, who was elected
to Rep. David Vitter's seat when Vitter ran for U.S. Senate in 2003,
was re-elected for a second term with 88 percent of the vote. That's
not enough experience? It's as much experience in Congress as Barack
Obama has to show for his three years. Oh, and by the way, Jindal, in
his last term, had an ACU rating of 100, with 96 for both terms. In
addition he has consistently taken the No New Taxes pledge proposed by
Americans for Tax Reform.
Jindal may be young but he's been pretty busy:
...In 1991 he was a young
Hill staffer working for U.S. Rep. Jim McCrery. One day McCrery asked
him to look over some Medicare plans being proposed in committee. A
couple of days later, he brought back to the boss a totally revised
system that was so impressive McCrery introduced him to Louisiana
Governor Murphy J. Foster Jr. A few years later, Jindal, at the age of
24, was appointed Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and
Hospitals. He took hold of the state's Medicare program, which was
running at a loss of $400 million, and in three years produced a
surplus of $200 million. He later became chairman of the National
Bipartisan Commission on the Future of Medicare. In 2001, he was
nominated by President George W. Bush and approved by the U.S. Senate
to be Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation of Health and
Human Services. If Jindal gets a chance to debate Hillary Clinton,
Hillary will be fumbling for her cue cards.
Is this going to be
an election about education? Jindal is an expert at that too. Jindal
graduated from high school at age 16, took a bachelor's degree at Brown
University, and then got a Masters degree at New College, Oxford as a
Rhodes Scholar. After he cleaned up the Medicare mess in Louisiana, he
was appointed in 1999 as President of the University of Louisiana
System.
Lucier closes with an appeal for McCain to choose Jindal and choose soon:
If McCain is to win, he
needs not just numbers but enthusiasm. The Democratic primaries
consistently have brought out twice as many voters as the Republican
primaries. Jindal has already demonstrated that he can get voters
enthused. The old rules that chose vice presidents for sectional
balance or the ability to win big states are out of date. Moreover,
Jindal record on issues and accomplishment can easily satisfy the base
of the Republican Party. He rises above provincialism. His ethnicity
will appeal not only to minorities at home who feel that they have been
ignored, but will reach out across oceans to project the American dream
to the world. Jindal has crammed a lot of legislative and executive
experience into a career that is just beginning. If McCain wants to
prove to conservatives that he means business and not empty words, he
could not do better than to chose Jindal. Soon.
Romney or Jindal. I guess the logical choice would be Romney now, and assuming McCain wins, Jindal could be the VP candidate in 2012, again assuming here that McCain will only serve one term. That would suit me fine. But I'm not one of the fence-sitters. I will vote for McCain regardless because the alternative is unthinkable.